Carbon dating different results
The equation is the one which describes radioactive decay: If one of these assumptions has been violated, the simple computation above yields an incorrect age.
Note that the mere existence of these assumptions do not render the simpler dating methods entirely useless.
Does the effects of this difference in speed on our bodies impact our lifespan or our physiology over our lifetimes?
For some reason, which I have not yet figured out, at least one person per week has been asking me about the Carbon-14 Radiometric Dating Technique.
The approximate time since the organism died can be worked out by measuring the amount of carbon-14 left in its remains compared to the amount in living organisms.
The simplest form of isotopic age computation involves substituting three measurements into an equation of four variables, and solving for the fourth.
Carbon-14 decays to nitrogen-14 by emitting an electron and a neutrino, and it does so with a half-life of 5,730 years.
In many cases, there are independent cues (such as geologic setting or the chemistry of the specimen) which can suggest that such assumptions are entirely reasonable.
However, the methods must be used with care -- and one should be cautious about investing much confidence in the resulting age...
They want to know if it is accurate or if it works at all.
Worse still, sometimes they want to know how evolutionists use Carbon-14 to date dinosaur fossils!